Fibromas on a raccoons hind

Fibromas in Wildlife: Understanding the Causes, Signs, and Management Strategies

Fibromas are benign tumors commonly found in a wide range of wildlife species. These tumors can have significant impacts on wildlife populations, including reduced mobility, reduced feeding efficiency, and increased susceptibility to predation. In this article, we will explore the causes, significance, species affected, distribution, transmission, clinical signs, diagnosis, treatment, management, and conclusion of fibromas in wildlife.

Cause

Fibromas are caused by a virus known as the Fibroma Virus (FV). The virus belongs to the family of poxviruses, which also includes viruses that cause diseases such as avian pox and cowpox. The virus is spread through direct contact with infected animals or contaminated environments. The virus can also be spread through insect vectors, such as mosquitoes or ticks, which can transmit the virus between animals.

Significance

Fibromas can have significant impacts on wildlife populations, particularly if the tumors are widespread. The tumors can reduce an animal’s mobility and feeding efficiency, making it more vulnerable to predation. The tumors can also become infected, leading to a range of health problems. In some cases, fibromas can be fatal, particularly if they grow near vital organs such as the eyes, ears, or mouth.

Species Affected

Fibromas have been reported in a wide range of wildlife species, including deer, elk, bison, moose, raccoons, rabbits, squirrels, and birds. However, the prevalence of fibromas varies between species, with some species being more susceptible than others. For the general public, fibromas are most often reported in wildlife that frequent urban areas which make squirrels and other rodents one of the most frequently reported species.

Distribution

Fibromas have been reported in wildlife populations worldwide, although the prevalence of the disease can vary widely between regions. In North America, for example, the disease is most commonly found in white-tailed deer populations, whereas in Europe, it is more commonly found in roe deer populations.

Transmission

The Fibroma Virus is spread through direct contact with infected animals or contaminated environments. The virus can also be spread through insect vectors, such as mosquitoes or ticks, which can transmit the virus between animals. The virus can remain viable in the environment for up to several months, making it difficult to eradicate.

Clinical Signs

The clinical signs of fibromas can vary widely between species and individuals. In some cases, the tumors may be small and asymptomatic, whereas in other cases, the tumors may be large and cause significant health problems. Some common clinical signs of fibromas include:

  • Raised, wart-like growths on the skin
  • Difficulty moving or walking
  • Difficulty eating or drinking
  • Breathing difficulties
  • Eye or ear infections
  • Increased susceptibility to predation
  • Reduced reproductive success

Diagnosis

Diagnosing fibromas in wildlife can be challenging, particularly in the early stages of the disease. However, veterinarians and wildlife biologists can use a range of techniques to identify the disease, including:

  • Physical examination of the animal
  • Biopsy of the tumor
  • Blood tests to identify the presence of the virus
  • PCR tests to identify the virus in the blood or tissue samples

Treatment

There is no known cure for fibromas in wildlife. It is important to note that these tumors are not contagious and will not spread between individuals, however, they can cause severe physical impairment or mortality in some cases, particularly when they obstruct an animal’s airway or digestive tract. Therefore, it is important to monitor affected individuals to ensure that they are not experiencing any adverse effects from the tumors. In some cases, the fibromas may spontaneously regress or fall off on their own.

If an animal is experiencing severe physical impairment or if the tumor is in a location that is causing discomfort or difficulty, surgical intervention may be considered. However, surgical removal of fibromas can be challenging, particularly in delicate areas such as the eyelid or mouth, and there is a risk of excessive bleeding or infection. Therefore, it should only be attempted by a trained veterinarian with experience in wildlife surgery.

Management

Fibromas can have significant impacts on populations of wildlife, particularly when they affect a large proportion of individuals within a population. In some cases, fibromas may cause mortality, particularly in young animals or those with weakened immune systems. Therefore, it is important to monitor populations of wildlife for the presence of fibromas and to document their prevalence and severity over time.

There are no known effective management strategies for fibromas in wildlife populations. However, research is ongoing to better understand the factors that contribute to the development and spread of these tumors, and to identify potential management strategies that may be effective in reducing their prevalence or severity.

Conclusion

Fibromas are a common and often benign tumor that affects a wide range of wildlife species, particularly in the United States. Although the tumors are not contagious, they can cause significant physical impairment or mortality in some cases, particularly when they obstruct an animal’s airway or digestive tract. There is no known cure for fibromas, and surgical removal can be challenging and risky.

Therefore, it is important to monitor affected individuals to ensure that they are not experiencing any adverse effects from the tumors, and to monitor populations of wildlife for the presence of fibromas over time. Ongoing research is needed to better understand the factors that contribute to the development and spread of these tumors, and to identify potential management strategies that may be effective in reducing their prevalence or severity.

Sources:

  1. Blas-Machado U, Ruiz-Saenz J. Fibropapillomatosis in marine turtles. Vet J. 2016 Jan;207:41-8.
  2. Herbst LH, Klein PA. Green turtle fibropapillomatosis: challenges to assessing the role of environmental cofactors. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Nov;103 Suppl 4:27-30.
  3. Quackenbush SL, Casey RN, Murcek RJ, Paul TA, Work TM, Limpus CJ, Chaves A, duToit L, Perez JV, Aguirre AA, Spraker TR. Quantitative analysis of herpesvirus sequences from normal tissue and fibropapillomas of captive green turtles with real-time PCR. Virology. 2001 Dec 20;290(2):294-9.
  4. Work TM, Balazs GH, Rameyer RA, Morris RA, Baines JD. Immune status of free-ranging green turtles with fibropapillomatosis from Hawaii. J Wildl Dis. 2001 Oct;37(4):574-8.